🔗 Share this article

Russia's monetary authority has stated it is claiming compensation valued at $230 billion against the securities depository Euroclear. This move constitutes a clear warning by the Kremlin regarding proposals to use frozen Russian state assets to aid Ukraine.

The Legal Claim

According to accounts in Russian news outlets, the monetary authority initiated a lawsuit last week for roughly 18 trillion roubles. This amount is equivalent to the aforementioned $230 billion claim.

European Union officials will decide in the coming days regarding a proposal to leverage approximately €210 billion in frozen Russian state funds. This scheme involves granting Ukraine with a large loan to finance its military and financial needs.

The vast majority of these funds, amounting to €185 billion, are held at the Euroclear depository in Brussels. This institution serves as the primary keeper for the Russian immobilised sovereign wealth.

Dispute on Ownership

European Union authorities have maintained that their plan is legally sound. Their position rests on the principle that ownership of the sovereign wealth still belongs to Russia, even though it was immobilized in European jurisdictions following the full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

The Russian government, however, has called any utilization of the assets as illegal appropriation. It has threatened retaliatory measures, including seizing EU private investors' assets within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, a figure who has taken on a prominent position in diplomatic talks, stated on X that Russia "will prevail in court" and regain its funds. He added that the EU, the euro, and Euroclear "will suffer" from the proposal.

Wider Implications

With statements seen as an effort to create division between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev described the proposal as "a vicious attack on the right to ownership and the international reserves system established by the United States."

The clearing house refused to comment on the new lawsuit. It has in the past noted it is contending with more than 100 lawsuits in Russian jurisdictions.

Enforcement Challenges

While courts in EU countries are unlikely to enforce rulings from Russian tribunals, analysts anticipate Moscow to pursue enforcement in countries with closer relations to the Kremlin.

"The Bank of Russia could try to enforce a Russian court's decision against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other friendly nations, provided that such assets can be located," commented a lawyer from an NSP law firm.

EU Countermeasures

European authorities indicated they are working on measures to deter other nations from assisting any Russian lawsuits against EU entities. Additionally, they are designing safeguards to shield EU member states with assets in Russia from what they call "illegal expropriation."

How the Funding Would Work

According to the complex scheme, the EU would issue an first €90 billion loan to Ukraine, using the cash earned from the immobilized assets at Euroclear. Importantly, Russia's legal claim on the underlying funds would remain untouched.

Kyiv would only be obligated to return the money if and when Russia consented to pay reparations for the immense destruction inflicted during the nearly four-year war.

Alternative Proposals

Belgium, backed by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has urged the EU to consider an alternative approach for financing Ukraine. This involves joint EU debt issuance to fund a loan, using unused funds within the European budget.

This alternative move, nevertheless, requires unanimity among all 27 EU countries. The Hungarian government, viewed as friendly with the Kremlin, has previously expressed its objection.

Speaking on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, a senior official, described the proposed loan scheme as "the strongest option" for supporting Ukraine. "The reparations loan is based on the Russian immobilized funds, which means it is not drawn from our public funds, which is equally significant," she remarked. "Furthermore, it sends a powerful message that if you do all this destruction to another country, you must pay for the reparations."